This election is ridiculous. I’m not going to pretend it’s not. I know I have only voted in 2 elections so far, but this one seems like one of those that the history books are going to be highlighting.
When I was in middle school, my classmates took a poll on who the students would vote for if they could. I was one of like 5 kids that said George W. Bush. Florida might geographically be in the South, but it’s a purple state at best & I definitely live in a blue county. Of course, back then my ‘politics’ was shaped by my parents. In high school when we could finally register to vote our senior year, I registered as a Republican. When I finally could vote, I voted Republican. As I grew older & went on to attend the University of Florida, a liberal university, my stance as a conservative solidified & my pro-life advocacy started.
Being a Republican is not a part of my identity. Being a Christian is, & being pro-life is. I’m also a wife & mother – my baby is almost 16 weeks gestation. Now that you have a little bit of a background on me, I’ll go on.
I am not sure who I will be voting for in November this year. What I do know, is that it will NOT be Hillary Clinton.
This post by Rachel Held Evan is well written & thoughtful. I read a portion of it last night when a friend quoted the section on Evangelicals on Facebook. That part resonates with me 100%, and that list is among the many reasons I cannot endorse Trump as the candidate. I suggest that, like me, you read that section first. It’s at the very end. My favorite line is, “how you can oppose sexual immorality while shrugging off the transgressions of a strip club owner who brags about his sexual exploits and extramarital affairs and who publicly sexualized both of his daughters?” In my opinion, porn culture, rape culture, & abortion culture go hand-in-hand.
There are some things in Rachel’s post I do agree with, but my conclusion is vastly different from hers. Here are some of my thoughts:
- “So even though I think abortion is morally wrong in most cases, and support more legal restrictions around it, I often vote for pro-choice candidates when I think their policies will do the most to address the health and economic concerns that drive women to get abortions in the first place. For me, it’s not just about being pro-birth; it’s about being pro-life. Every child deserves to live in a home and in a culture that welcomes them and can meet their basic needs. Every mother deserves the chance to thrive. Forcing millions of women to have children they can’t support, or driving them to Gosnell-style black market clinics, will not do.”
Abortion is wrong in ALL cases. Abortion is the willful termination of a human being’s life. Whether the fetus is disabled, will die shortly after birth, the result of rape, or simply ‘inconvenient’ does not matter. Just like all children & adults all deserve to be treated equally regardless of education, income, race, ability, & gender, all human fetuses should have the right to live. People conceived in rape do not deserve to die, just ask Rebecca Kiessling & her friends at Save The 1%.
I don’t think Rachel agrees with me & other pro-lifers about making abortion unthinkable. It is not enough to make it illegal. Saying that every child deserves”culture that welcomes them and can meet their basic needs” sounds nice, but sometimes it doesn’t happen that way. Children conceived in poverty are no less disposable than poor adults. Some very influential people lived in poverty & overcame it. We need to change from a ‘culture of death’ with its abortion on demand, capital punishment, & doctor assisted suicide to a ‘culture of life’. In a culture of life, women wouldn’t feel “forced” to have babies – they would welcome their unexpected miracles & have support.
Rachel says, “voting pro-choice is not the same as voting for abortion.” The words are true, but the action is not. Democrats For Life thinks the Democrat platform for this election is too abortion focused. They are fighting for room for pro-life people & ideas in the ‘big tent’. They are fighting for a culture of life.
Hillary Clinton will not get us in that direction. She’s not even touting ‘safe, legal, and rare’ anymore. She wants to repeal the Hyde Amendment, which has received bipartisan support since enacted in 1976. Repealing the Hyde amendment would mean tax-payer funded abortions for women on Medicaid. My mom was on Medicaid when she had me. She needed medical care for her & for me – not an abortion (she has always been pro-life, but why should abortion even be an option under Medicaid?) I am currently a board member of #HelloHyde, a campaign celebrating the 40th anniversary of Hyde this year whose aim is to put faces to the statistics that Hyde opponents like to throw around.
Medicaid does bring me to a point that I agree with Rachel on:
2.”Pro-life advocates should support, rather than oppose, efforts to help low-income families care for their children.”
This is something I can get behind 100%. We should absolutely fight for paid family leave, better childcare options, programs such as Medicaid & WIC, better foster care systems, etc. But, in the mean time, babies still don’t deserve to die. Rachel gives an example of a poor mother of 2 who is struggling to make ends meet & finds herself pregnant for the 3rd time. Rachel seems to suggest that OF COURSE this woman should get an abortion! That doesn’t sound very Christian or pro-life to me. I don’t know Rachel personally, & am not jumping to conclusions from one blog post. I am just pointing out how ‘culture of death’ that sounds.
Rachel points out that Hillary has addressed a lot of these programs & even made them “a centerpiece of her campaign.” That’s great; I’m not saying Hillary is the devil & incapable of doing any good. But Hillary only wants these things after a person has passed the magical line between uterus & outside world. I feel like I have to say it again. Babies don’t have to die for us to have these programs. It’s not one or the other. Shame on Republican officials who turn their noses up at these programs under the guise of being concerned about ‘government handouts’. Jesus said in Matthew 25, the parable of the sheep & the goats, “‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’” Well, the least of these absolutely includes unborn babies.
3.”if we want to dramatically reduce the abortion rate in this country, we must support efforts to make contraception more accessible and affordable.”
This is one topic that definitely divides pro-lifers. I need to play devil’s advocate for a second: some hormonal forms of birth control can have abortifacient effects. Hormonal birth control is not the same as Plan B, which is not the same as the abortion pill. But what hormonal birth control & Plan B can do, is prevent a zygote from implanting. If like me (and like science), you belief human life starts at conception, then some of these products are unacceptable. Not to mention that hormonal birth control can also have some crazy side effects. I don’t judge anyone for using it, but I am pointing out to Rachel some of the reasons why this is just not a valid option in a lot of pro-lifer’s eyes.
That being said, barrier methods of birth control should be accessible to all, and people should know how to use them correctly. Regardless of whatever personal views people might have about sex, there should be some education on it. However, I certainly don’t trust Planned Parenthood to be the educators. Especially when they are constantly covering up statutory rape cases, refusing to report when girls as young as 13 are brought in for abortions, and telling 15 year olds it’s ok to let your partner beat you for pleasure. Well, guess who 100% supports Planned Parenthood & continually fights to keep them government funded? Hillary. Planned Parenthood calls her “Our Nation’s Best Presidential Candidate for Reproductive Rights, Hands Down.” So before conflicted pro-lifers such as myself head to the polls in November, they should know that the organization that kills over 200,000 babies a year thinks Hillary is amazing.
Rachel is right in saying that neither Trump nor Hillary are our pro-life saviors. I’m not looking for a savior, I have a savior. I disagree with her position that Hillary will be better for us to keep the abortion rate down. I don’t think that fact is being helped by Washington, DC, where the supreme court just said it’s OK for abortion clinics not to follow the same standards as other surgical centers. Are we going to drop the ‘safe’ part of ‘safe, legal, & rare’, too? What about the justices that next year’s president will appoint?
Rachel basically argues that the devil you know is better than the one you don’t. I disagree in this instance. Like I said, I don’t know Rachel Held Evan at all. Also like I said I don’t yet know who I will vote for in November. Maybe I will vote for Gary Johnson. Yes, he’s pro-choice, but he is for repealing Roe vs Wade, for late term abortion restrictions, and for state’s rights on the issue. Maybe I’ll write in some other candidate. Or maybe I will break down & vote for Donald Trump (probably not). But one thing is for sure, my pro-life conviction will absolutely not allow me to vote for Hillary Clinton.